Search results
- www.cplusplus.com/forum/beginner/15959 CachedNot necessarily. I assume by size_type you mean the typedef inside most STL containers? If so, then just because size_type was added to all the containers instead
- www.cplusplus.com/forum/beginner/61040 CachedWhen should I use "size_type" instead of "int" to claim the ... (vector<int>::iterator i ... I often use size_t instead of size_type because then I don't have to ...
- social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/vcgeneral/thread/... Cachedfor (vector<int>::size_type i = 0; i != 10; i++) myvec[i] = someval; or should I use size_t? Reply; Quote . ... i != 10; i++) Yes. >or should I use size_t?
- forums.devx.com/showthread.php?142067-filling-a-vector... CachedCode: //: S15:AllMyRodents.cpp #include <iostream> #include <vector> #include ... Well, a trough and through program should use the exact type that size() returns ...
- answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130120075138AAPXdrr Cached[Jan 20, 2013] We could use std:: vector ::size_type or simply std:: size_t (from header ) instead of " int" for the index variable. Also, ... ~ by Mary ( 1 comments )
- bytes.com/topic/c/answers/157792-conversion-size_t-int CachedNo, 'std::vector<>::size()'s return type is not 'size_t', but 'std::vector<>::size_type'. The above should be written: ... use: std::vector<int>::size_type size = v ...
- bytes.com/topic/c/answers/720706-vector-size_type CachedI'm tempted to use it instead of the latter. Hm, poor form. It is shorter, but it looses meaning. With size_type, you ... vector<int>::size_type to be size_t.
- answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130120075138AAPXdrr Cached[Jan 20, 2013] We could use std:: vector ::size_type or simply std:: size_t (from header ) instead of "int" for the ... we should pass the vector parameter by ... ~ by Mary ( 1 comments )
- ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-898189.html Cached[Archive] [C++] When should I use size_t? Programming Talk
- stackoverflow.com/questions/1951519/when-to-use-stdsize-t CachedAs for vector<T>::size_type (and ditto for all other containers), it's actually rather useless, ... Then you must use size_t instead of int as loop index, ...
- stackoverflow.com/.../4849678/c-for-loop-size-type-vs-size-t CachedYou should not use intbecause vector<int>::size_type is an unsigned type, ... string::size_type instead of int. 4. C++ - vector<int>::size_type. 1. C++ vector - push ...
- stackoverflow.com/questions/131803 CachedWhen writing C code you should always use size_t whenever dealing with memory ranges. ... Also, I just realised I was writing 65356 instead of 65536 - whoops!
- stackoverflow.com/questions/15704966/is-it-okay-to-use... CachedIs it okay to use int instead of a size_t in looping over a vector? ... you'd want to use std::vector<int>::size_type (which I imagine is almost always size_t, but ...
- stackoverflow.com/questions/4849632/c-vectorintsize-type Cachedvector<int>::size_type x; And, ... size_type instead of int. 2. Do I really need to return Type:: ... C++ for-loop - size_type vs. size_t. 1.
No comments:
Post a Comment